|  |  | 
I have to ask the obvious questions from the Zetas:
1. Was this in fact a real terrorist attempt or a covert plot by British/USA operatives?
2. Was this another episode of a British/USA "wag the dog" plot to show how effective they are in stopping terrorism?
3. If it was real, did the Zetas tip off people to avert another reason to impose Martial Law?
Once again there is a terror alert capturing complete control of the
      media. Recently there was the threat of the Sears Tower being bombed by a
      group of Haitian yahoos being supplied by the FBI, and the Toronto bust of
      some Muslim hopefuls being supplied fertilizer by the Mounties, or a
      London bust based on false intelligence wherein an innocent man was shot.
      Is this any different? The plot was known for months, a subject of
      conversation between Bush and Blair. How much of a threat was
      this? If liquids or gels could be exploded so easily, then why were they
      allowed on planes all these months? Just now, they become
      dangerous, and must be screened out? And how much was this group
      supplied and encouraged by MI-5 and the CIA? How convenient to capture the
      media on the date that a much watched primary was lost by the Bush hugging
      Lieberman in Connecticut. They are losing, fear to lose their seats of
      power before the pole shift precursors reach a crescendo whereby they
      could declare Martial Law and
      thence be in power for life. If these fake
        terror alerts don't do the trick, other steps will be taken, as Bush
      and Blair are cornered animals, and cornered animals go on the attack. 
      
      As any history buff can relay, political leaders point the finger away
      from their failures by declaring the borders unsafe. Start a war, point to
      threats of war, and the citizenry stand behind the leader and stop
      complaining. 911 was not an act done by 19 suicidal Muslims, nor was the London 77 bombing a Muslim plot.
      Muslims were scarcely at the helm, and the operations only successful
      because of assists from the US and British governments. Muslim
      participation is waved about, arrests made, and the insider assists kept
      from the major media, and were it not for the Internet would not be widely
      known at all. In recent terror alerts, the US and British and Canadian
      intelligence agencies armed and incited Muslims and then pointed to them
      as causative agents. What is this saying about the state of mind
      of the leadership in these countries? They have, of course, been trying to
      cause terrorism episodes regularly. These have failed, as we have stated,
      because the Council of Worlds has allowed us to intervene. But inciting
      them and then declaring they were about to happen has not been
      prevented, nor is it likely to be. The pattern is obvious enough to the
      citizenry, who are not fooled in the main. But where is this leading?
      
      The Bush plan was to commandeer all the oil fields in the world, sit on
      them, and be in charge of this black gold after the pole shift. He has
      already tried to order the US Military into Iran, and they have refused.
      He has tried to force their hand by bombing the Golden
        Mosque to incite civil war in Iraq. He is encouraging Israel to
      engage Hezbollah, hoping the Shia majority in Iran and Syria engage in
      support of Hezbollah. He is losing on this front, and the steady push by
      the US citizenry and the US Military for withdrawal from the Middle East
      will continue. But he still hopes to prevail, to hang on in power, and in
      the end be King of the oil fields. We have stated that Bush, in his
      desperation to stay in charge and not be defeated by a Democratic
      Congress, may attempt to declare Martial
        Law. This disconnects the Congress and the judiciary, allowing him
      to be a dictator. This allows him to unleash the US Military within the
      US, suppressing all criticism of his regime. This same trend is present in
      the UK, but Blair is likely to be unseated cleanly, and does not have the
      legal avenues that Bush surmises he does. Will this succeed? Hardly, but
      this will not stop an attempt, which we predict will be made and will
      fail. If the constant news about terror plots does not win the elections,
      then they will be used as an excuse to declare Martial Law in the US. 
- Signs of the Times #1630
- Thwarting the Airline Plot: Inside the Investigation [Aug 11] http://www.time.com/ Britain's MI-5 intelligence service and Scotland Yard had been tracking the plot for several months, but only in the past two weeks had the plotters' planning begun to crystallize. MI5 and Scotland Yard agents tracked the plotters from the ground, while U.S. intelligence provided London authorities with intercepts of the group's communications. [and from another] Explosive Gel Was to Be Concealed in Sports Drink [Aug 10] http://blogs.abcnews.com/ The plotters planned to leave the top of the bottle sealed and filled with the original beverage but add a false bottom, filled with a liquid or gel explosive. The terrorists planned to dye the explosive mixture red to match the sports drink sealed in the top half of the container. This, they thought, would ensure that they would be able to pass through security -- even if they were asked to unseal and drink the beverage. And trigger the device with the flash from a disposable camera. [and from another] Blair forewarned Bush of terror threat to US airlines [Aug 11] http://politics.guardian.co.uk/ Downing Street admitted Tony Blair has known about it in general terms for months, and has spoken to President George Bush about it on a number of occasions. [and from another] Bush seeks political gains from foiled plot [Aug 10] http://news.yahoo.com/ President George W. Bush seized on a foiled London airline bomb plot to hammer unnamed critics he accused of having all but forgotten the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. [and from another] http://www.rawstory.com/ [Aug 10] Vice President Dick Cheney has continued the Bush Administration's push to characterize the primary loss of Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) as an indication that the Democratic party is weakening on security issues. [and from another] Rove called Lieberman on voting day [Aug 10] http://today.reuters.com/ Top Republicans, including Vice President Dick Cheney, have taken the unusual step of publicly commenting on the results of the Democratic primary that Lieberman lost on Tuesday to an anti-war challenger. "I called him. He's a personal friend," Rove told reporters.