| Satellite Collision 
An inactive Russian Cosmos orbiter purportedly crashed into an American Space Surveillance Network 
satellite on February 11, 2009 over Siberia.  
First Satellite Collision Produces Dangerous WreckageFebruary 11, 2009
 http://rawstory.com/news/2008/First_satellite_collision_produces_dangerous_wreckage_0211.html
Outer space is getting too crowded already. A satellite crash that occurred on Tuesday was 
the first of its kind, NASA reported Wednesday. Two communications satellites, a privately 
owned US machine and a presumably defunct Russian Cosmos orbiter, collided over 
northern Siberia around noon ET. As more and more devices are put into orbit around 
Earth to replace first-generation space equipment, the likelihood of satellite crashes 
causing expensive damage is increasing rapidly. Scientists have been warning of the 
danger of crowded orbits for years, but the solutions are lacking. The Space Surveillance 
Network, run by the US military, currently tracks 8,000 space objects in Earth's orbit. Of 
these 8,000, approximately 560 are operational satellites. The rest are rocket debris and 
non-operational satellites. The objects are regularly observed by the military in the Space 
Catalog. But though the tracking of satellites is extensive, our ability to do anything about 
an imminent crash is limited by distance. Satellites passively orbiting the planet have little 
to stop them, and if the military can calculate a crash in the near future, the most that can 
be done is a warning. The crash between the Iridium Corporation's satellite and the 
Cosmos orbiter resulted in 500 to 600 new pieces of debris going in every direction, 
crossing the orbits of other satellites.  Debris is steadily increasing up in space, but since this is the first recorded incident of two satellites 
crashing into each other, is the situation now out of control? Suddenly, we are being told the details 
about how crowded it is up there.  
We Need an Astral Air ControlFebruary 13, 2009
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5721476.ece
Of the 6,000 satellites launched since the first Soviet Sputnik 52 years ago, few have been 
brought back to Earth. No international law requires it, and the process consumes rocket 
fuel that could otherwise be used to keep the satellites operational for longer. There is no 
incentive to dispose of satellites responsibly. China chose instead to blow one up in 2007. 
The US followed suit last year in a thinly disguised test of its antimissile technology. The 
result is a thickening cloud of space junk that just got thicker. And suddenly, the incidence of fireballs, which have been increasing lately, is being blamed on debris 
from space. Was it a meteor? Probably just some space junk falling to Earth.  
Space Debris Rains Down On Kentucky Causing AlarmFebruary 14, 2009
 http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2009/02/14/space-debris-rains-down-on-kentucky-causing-alarm/
The 27 NEWSFIRST Newsroom checked into numerous reports of sightings of blue and 
white lights in the sky, as well as loud booms that, in some cases, rattled homes. So far, 
emergency officials in Kentucky believe the falling debris from the satellites has covered a 
500-mile area in North America, but has led to no injuries or damages. David Wright at 
the Union of Concerned Scientists' Global Security said the collision had possibly 
generated tens of thousands of particles larger than 1 centimeter half an inch, any of which 
could significantly damage or even destroy a satellite. Wright, in a posting on the group's 
Web site, said the two large debris clouds from Tuesday's crash will spread over time, 
forming a shell around Earth. Meanwhile, there's no global air traffic control system that 
tracks the position of all satellites. But are we being told the truth about the Russian and American satellite collision? How would the man 
on the street know, if it were not the truth? Certainly the establishment has no explanation for the 
increase in fireballs, and is not ready to explain to the populace that the debris-filled tail of Planet X is 
turning toward Earth. First they would have to broach the subject of Planet X itself. During one of the 
weekly live ZetaTalk chats, a poster noted that the two satellites had been nowhere near each other, and 
their orbits were very well known. 
 Question: Can the Zeta's comment on the reported recent collision of US and Russian satellites. 
Per available information, their orbits appeared to be hundreds of kilometers apart. How could 
they have collided if the public is not being dubed?
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision
 Orbital Apopsis: 803 km
 Orbital Periapsis: 778 km
 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/
 Orbital Periapsis: 522.0 km
 Orbital Apopsis: 541.0 km
 
 ZetaTalk Answer 2/14/2009: These satellites did not collide. Satellite orbits are very carefully 
managed, within and between countries sending them aloft. Why would it be otherwise? These 
are expensive machines, with much depending upon their operation. Even with the Russian 
satellite being inactive, no longer in use, as reported, these dead bodies are tracked by other 
means to ensure no collision with live satellites. A satellite may be out of control, but live 
satellites are in control and can be maneuvered to avoid those that are out of control.
 
 Why would a lie be spread? We have mentioned that satellites will increasingly fail, and this has been 
happening but has been hidden from the public. The public is to have the perception that space junk has 
gotten so cluttered that these types of accidents can happen, because accidents with satellites will 
increasingly happen. This is spin control by the establishment. What occurred over Kentucky was just 
another fireball, but is being booked in the media as space junk, to add an exclamation point to the 
colliding satellite story.
 
 Another fireball came to Earth on Sunday, February 15, 2009 and the FAA immediately promoted the 
space junk explanation.
 
 
   VIDEO: Texas Fireball
 
Falling Debris over Texas 'Related to US-Russian Satellite Collision'February 15, 2009
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/4634402/
Some of the callers around midmorning on Sunday reported what looked like a fireball in 
the sky. FAA spokesman Roland Herwig said officials suspect the debris could be related to 
the collision, but he said that had not been confirmed. The FAA notified pilots on Saturday 
to be aware of possible debris after a collision Tuesday between US and Russian 
communication satellites. The chief of Russia's Mission Control says clouds of debris from 
the collision will circle Earth and threaten numerous satellites. But a day later, the FAA spokesperson retracted his statement.  
FAA says Texas Fireball was Meteor, not a UFOFebruary 16, 2009
 http://www.kansascity.com/811/story/1037289.html
The fireball that streaked across the sky and alarmed numerous Texas residents was likely 
just a big meteor and not wreckage from colliding satellites, experts said Monday. Federal 
Aviation Administration spokesman Roland Herwig said the fireball seen across a wide 
stretch of the state Sunday morning probably was a natural phenomenon and not debris 
from last week's collision between an Iridium communications satellite and a Russian 
military space vehicle. The FAA had said during the weekend that the fireball possibly was 
caused by falling debris from the satellites. It also posted a weekend warning telling pilots 
to watch out for satellite debris but rescinded the warning Sunday, Herwig said. So when the satellites begin malfunctioning to the point of being an undeniable problem, as the Zetas 
have predicted, expect a quick explanation by the talking heads on TV that the falling debris is space 
junk. After all, satellites are even crashing into each other up there! Canadian Disclosure  
Canada has joined the list of nations opening their UFO files to the public.  
Canada releases UFO X-Files to the WorldFebruary 16, 2009
 http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner
The Canadian Government has authorized open public access to thousands of federal 
government documents concerning UFOs. A total of 9500 digitized documents spanning 
the years 1947 to the early 1980s have been made available through the Library and 
Archives Canada website. Canada's release of its UFO X-Files follows closely upon the 
release at the end of January of Denmark's UFO files. Britain continues to release 
thousands of UFO files through a program of gradual releases it began in May 2007 
through its national archives with the most recent being on October 2008. The French 
Space Agency had earlier announced on March 22, 2007, that it was making public its 
secret UFO files through a government website. Canada therefore joins a select group of 
countries that have so far publicly released UFO files. As President Obama heads to 
Canada on February 19, he could take time from his busy schedule to ask Prime Minister 
Steven Harper for tips on how the U.S. might release to the public its own classified UFO 
X-Files. But the Zetas have consistently maintained that the US will be dragging its feet regarding disclosure of 
the alien presence, even with Obama now at the helm. What is pushing disclosure is the increasing 
incidence of UFO sightings, including mass sightings that cannot be denied. Those governments which 
continue to insist that it is all swamp gas and weather balloons will be subject to ridicule. 
 Question: A meeting between ONU (United Nation Organization) and USA has been place last 
week. This meeting was supposed to relate to release of UFO information to the media and to the 
rest of the world. Could you explain about this?
 
 ZetaTalk Answer 7/12/2008: There are constant meetings among countries about this issue. 
Many countries have taken the lead, such as France and Chile, and many others have been more 
open than the US for years, such as Russia. Meanwhile sightings are increasing and the public 
sees the cover-up as ridiculous. The reason for reluctance is that those who perpetrated the 
cover-up fear being challenged by their public. The intelligence arms of the US military were 
front and center during the cover-up, as members of MJ12. Much heated argument now goes on 
behind closed doors, and very little progress occurs. We expect this to be the case right up to and 
past the time of the pole shift. Meanwhile, sightings are on the increase, etc.
 
 Question: I have noticed a sudden increase in alien disclosure reports in the mainstream media. 
This is nothing new but is the Obama administration taking a new initiative to finish what 
Kennedy started?
 
 ZetaTalk Answer 11/29/2008: This has all been beginning well before Obama is in the White 
House. Increasing disclosure has been in process for some years, albeit only evident in other 
countries until recently. The Bush administration has been resistant, but is facing the reality that 
they are washing out and will not be in power in the near future. It is the increase in mass 
sightings, and the percentage of the populace who frankly believe that aliens not only exist but 
are visiting, that is pushing disclosure. Obama need do nothing!
 
 Question: Will there ever be "disclosure" before of after the Pole Shift?
 
 ZetaTalk Answer 1/17/2009: We have explained that disclosure of the alien presence will not 
occur as most in the public would like, with a broad explanation and admission by the 
governments of the world, and in particular by the US government. The Awakening proceeds 
apace, as anxiety around the world drops and mass sightings increase. Many governments are 
disclosing what they know, notably France, the UK, Chile and Russia. It is too broad a step for 
full disclosure as such an admission begs the question of what else the government has been 
hiding, and the cover-up over Planet X is not about to crack at present.
 Job Loss  
Following on the heels of the Wall Street crash in September, 2008 when the housing bubble burst, a 
contraction whereby businesses are stocking less inventory and booking fewer orders has occurred. Job 
losses inevitably follow. 
 
   
What 3.6 Million Jobs Lost Over 13 Months Looks LikeFebruary 6, 2009
 http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=1683
This chart compares the job loss so far in this recession to job losses in the 1990-1991 
recession and the 2001 recession - showing how dramatic and unprecedented the job loss 
over the last 13 months has been. Over the last 13 months, our economy has lost a total of 
3.6 million jobs - and continuing job losses in the next few months are predicted. By 
comparison, we lost a total of 1.6 million jobs in the 1990-1991 recession, before the 
economy began turning around and jobs began increasing; and we lost a total of 2.7 
million jobs in the 2001 recession, before the economy began turning around and jobs 
began increasing. And the hemorrhaging continues into 2009. 
Worst Year for Jobs Since '45January 9, 2009
 http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/09/news/economy/jobs_december/
The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, 
bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six 
decades. A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 
524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit 
crisis began in September. Job Loss: Worst in 34 YearsFebruary 6, 2009
 http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/06/news/economy/jobs_january/
Employers slashed another 598,000 jobs off of U.S. payrolls in January, taking the 
unemployment rate up to 7.6%, according to the latest government reading on the nation's 
battered labor market. Nearly 5 Million are Getting Unemployment BenefitsFebruary 19, 2009
 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090219/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy
The number of laid-off workers receiving unemployment benefits has jumped to an all-time 
high near 5 million while new jobless claims remain well above 600,000. Both figures were 
worse than expected and new projections from the Federal Reserve show unemployment 
rising for the rest of this year. Per the Zetas, this is to be expected as they predicted that the world would go into a second Great 
Depression prior to the pole shift. The current state of affairs will not return to prior levels. 
 ZetaTalk Comment 1/3/2009: We stated at the start of ZetaTalk in 1995 that the world was 
heading into a depression, and that this fact was masked by maneuvers of the Bush 
administration such as the housing bubble and the expensive war effort in Iraq. We stated when 
the DOW was artificially maintained by the Plunge Protection Team and others doing insider 
trading that this practice would only last until the individual parties being asked to delay a sale 
rebelled, looking out for their own self interest instead of doing a favor for the Bush 
administration. Now that the truth is known, it will shortly become obvious that the world's 
economy is in a depression, not a recession. Nor will the world recover prior to the pole shift, 
when it will no longer matter.
 Video Clip on Yellowstone  
 The Zetas Report 27 - Yellowstone - Is it about to blow? And when it does, will it be 
a supervolcano? 
 Click on the image or click Here to watch.
 
 You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly 
Unsubscribe.  |