A massive explosion at the Sajano-Shushenskoj hydroelectric power station occurred on August 17, 2009, when a transformer exploded. These transformers had been in place for 20-40 years, performing reliably. Transformers "step-up" the voltage from turbines turned by the flow of water from the dam.

Sayano-Shushenskaya Hydroelectric Power Station
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayano%E2%80%93Shushenskaya_hydroelectric_power_station

Construction of the power station started in 1968; the plant was opened in 1978. It was partially reconstructed in 1987. At 8:15 local time (00:15 GMT) on 17 August 2009, the station suffered a catastrophic "pressure surge". During repair work a sudden change in water pressure caused a water pipe to burst resulting a transformer explosion and flooding in the engine and turbines rooms. The cause of the accident is unclear. Defective turbines and a rise of pressure in the pipes are speculated to be possible causes. According to Alexander Toloshinov, a former general director of the plant, the accident was most likely due to a "manufacturing defect" in a turbine.

 

13 dead, 61 Feared Dead in Siberia Plant Explosion
August 19, 2009
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/

Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko described the accident as "the biggest and most mysterious in global hydroenergy" and said it would cost 40 billion rubles ($1.2 billion) to rebuild the power plant's engine room. The cause of the accident was still unclear. Officials and the plant's owner have cited a faulty turbine and a rise of pressure in the pipes as possible causes.

Per the Zetas, location had something to do with this explosion, which was not caused by excessive water pressure or a defect in the transformers. Take the globe in your hands, the Universal Time Code (UTC) zone, i.e. Greenwich, facing you. Note that the location of the Sajano-Shushenskoj power station is at the side, to the right. Per the Zetas, the explosion was due to an electromagnetic tsunami caused by the clash of planetary magnetic fields between Earth and Planet X. This tsunami flowed from the clash point out over the edges of the Earth.



ZetaTalk Explanation 8/21/2009: The cause of this accident will never be known as the evidence is in pieces. It will remain speculation, and because blaming a transformer that cannot be reassembled is the easy way out, this will be the claimed cause. If the transformers had a "fault" that finally proved fatal, it seems odd that it functioned for over 20 years, since the power station was fully operational. Transformers take the motion from a flow of water, convert this into a churning motion in an electromagnetic chamber to induce an electric current. If the flow is too strong, the churn can be too rapid, and presumably this is the logic behind blaming the explosion on a transformer fault. A rapidly turning turbine might overheat, would be the logic. But there are built-in brakes in power stations, so that such a runaway situation cannot occur. If there is too little water above the dam to meet the needs in many forthcoming months, the force of water is very carefully controlled so as not to waste water. What we are saying is that the force of water, the amount of water, can be controled at many points, and diverted if runoff is needed so the dam does not overtop. These controls are manual and automatic, with backup and overlap. Running a power station of this size is not a casual operation.

Note the time of the explosion, 00:15 UTC. We have stated that one of the pressures on Earth during the approach of Planet X is that the magnetic Atlantic Rift is hugged or held when it faces the Sun and the approaching Planet X (which is coming toward Earth from the direction of the Sun). Magnets like to be in alignment, and Planet X is a bully magnet. This tug was apparent in 2003 on the live seizmographs in a twice a day shudder, 12 hours apart. The first tug occurred when the Atlantic Rift faced Planet X, at noon in Greenwich at 12:00 UTC and the second when it was on the dark side of the Earth, in opposition at 0:00 UTC. The Sayano-Shushenskaya explosion occurred when the rift was at the dark side, and was caused by the magnetic fields of Earth and Planet X touching and clashing momentarily. Such a situation was the warning in the recent August 10, 2009 Woodborough crop circle. Air France 447 went down over the Atlantic Rift during that same danger period, when the Atlantic Rift is in opposition, due to almost total failure of its electronic systems.

Planet X is pointing its N Pole at the Earth, pushing the Earth's N Pole away for a violent Earth wobble each day. Until the Earth tips away into 3 days of darkness, the magnetic field of Planet X is butting head-on into the side of the magnetic field of Earth, forming a T rather than a side-by-side alignment. While at the distance it is, this tends to scatter the magnetic field of Earth at the touch point, to dissipate the magnetic crowding. This crowding can be shown in the blast of magnetic particles that have been recorded periodically since January 21, 2009. There are harmonics that occur when two magnetic fields encounter each other. The fields clash and divert the magneton flow temporarily if they cannot merge in an alignment. In the meantime the flow of magnetons can be moving in almost any direction. When magnetic fields touch and clash, the crowding of magnetic particles that occurs at the touch point must go somewhere, and for the Earth, the push is a tsunami toward the sides of the Earth, taking the path of least resistance.

The Sayano-Shushenskaya power plant is directly at the side of this magneton rush, at 00:15 UTC, where the tsunami of magnetons is pouring over the sides of the Earth, rushing to leave the crowding that at times occurs when the planetary magnetic fields clash. Unlike the blasts that have been registered since January 21, 2009, where it appears magnetons are washing over the Earth as a whole, the touch point wash-to-the-sides is a diversion of magnetons. This can be compared to a tsunami, which pushes the overabundance of water ahead of the wave, where the blasts can be compared to a high tide, where the water is in greater abundance throughout the area. The Sayano-Shushenskaya power plant encountered this tsunami, flowing over the sides of the Earth, and the transformers reacted. The electron motion produced by the transformer was excited, enhanced by the electromagnetic tsunami surging through the area. Parts of the system were automatically instructed to brake, while other parts assumed the flow of water churning the system to be appropriate. This caused heat to build up, and an explosion was the result.

Second Sun Confusion

Three examples of the Second Sun, captured on film, have emerged recently. One, from Sweden, is one the web in a photo album, taken with an HP R707 camera and dated July 4, 2006. A Swedish questioner asks:

Hey I wonder is this the so called sunwheel or is it Planet X and how can you see the difference between these two?

This is not a sundog, a "sunwheel" as there is no halo around the Sun, and there is a reflection on the water from the object. Sundogs are reflected sunlight in ice crystals in the atmosphere that form along a halo line that circles the Sun, often appearing on both sides of the Sun at the same time, with a third sundog possible above the Sun. The point where the sundog touches the halo spreads out along the halo in a rainbow of colors. As the sundog is not an object in the sky but merely reflected light arriving at the eye of the beholder, it cannot generate a reflection on water. The photo, thus, is a genuine capture of Planet X at sunrise or sunset - the Second Sun.



The second image is from Poland, taken on July 10, 2009, and appearing on the NASA website and in a science article in Buenos Aires. The photographer states she saw this Second Sun with her naked eye, so it cannot be discounted as an internal lens reflection.

A Triple Sunrise Over Gdansk Bay
August 4, 2009
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090804.html

Explanation: How can the same Sun rise three times? Last month on Friday, 2009 July 10, a spectacular triple sunrise was photographed at about 4:30 am over Gdansk Bay in Gdansk, Poland. Clearly, our Sun rises only once. Some optical effect is creating at least two mirages of the Sun -- but which effect? In the vast majority of similarly reported cases, mirages of the brightest object in the frame can be traced to reflections internal to the camera taking the images. Still, the above image is intriguing because a sincere photographer claims the effect was visible to the unaided eye, and because the photographer took several other frames that show variants of the same effect.

 

El día que el Sol Mostro 3 soles: Alertan de Nuevas Tormentas Solares
August 5, 2009
http://www.urgente24.com/index.php?id=ver&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=126970&cHash=e0a1bc0d44

El pasado 10 de julio un espectacular "triple atardecer" fue fotografiado en la Bahía Gdansk, en Polonia. El fotógrafo explicó que el efecto era visible a simple vista: una reflexión atmosférica óptica del sol, como si de tres soles se tratara. Aparentemente, el fenómeno llamó la atención de la NASA, que ya ha formulado una posible explicación: el fenómeno se trató de una extraña emisión de plasma solar. Por otra parte, LASCO 3 reportó hoy extrañas anomalías y se preveen nuevas tormentas solares de tipo C, para los próximos días. En concreto hay "alerta solar", para los días 7 y 8 de agosto, por lo que habrá que prestar atención a los patrones sísmicos y a la magnetosfera.

The commentary from posters on the Argentine blog speculate that this is Nibiru or Herbulobus, both alternate names for Planet X. A debate on the NASA blog notes that it is not clear if the photographer took these photos while standing on a balcony, so window reflection might be a factor. Some posters note that Second Sun sightings can occur after sunset if sunlight reflects off the ocean and bounces off the atmosphere to the viewers eye, but these are always verticle reflections, not horizontal. In this case, there seems to be a vertical but primarily a horizontal reflection, above and to the left hand side.

Note that where Second Sun sightings in the northern hemisphere are on the right of the Sun, in the southern hemisphere they are on the left of the Sun. This is because of the way the Ecliptic slants, in the view of those gazing at the sky. To put it crudely, those in the southern hemisphere are hanging upside down, where those in the northern hemisphere are standing upright. Or vice versa. Notice in this example below from Skymap that Venus seems to switch from the lefthand side of the Sun, for Boston, to the right hand side of the Sun for Buenos Aires. This is due to the Ecliptic slant.



Thus, the photo from Poland, and the photographer's statement that she saw this Second Sun naked eye, seem to conflict with what is expected from Second Sun sightings in the northern hemisphere. The Polish photographer offered several additional photos for analysis. What is going on here? The Zetas explain.



ZetaTalk Explanation 8/29/2009: The photos from Poland seem at first glance to be a Second Sun which is a window reflection of the Sun, though there are two reflections, above and below, which would not be the case in a window reflection. In an additional photo from Poland, these Second Suns seems to merge together into the upper left hand side. This is neither a window reflection nor a direct capture of Planet X at sundown, which we have been terming Second Sun sightings. NASA is featuring this photo in an attempt to confuse what they anticipate to be a rash of future Second Sun sightings, the genuine variety caused by Planet X. They are hoping to confuse both the term, "Second Sun" and the placement of the Second Sun in genuine sightings. What was actually captured in these photos from Poland?

This is an atmospheric phenomena caused indirectly by the presence of Planet X, what we have in the past called the Monster Sun phenomena. When genuine Second Sun sightings occur light is bouncing off the immense dust cloud that shrouds Planet X, bouncing at an angle such that the light goes from the Sun to the cloud thence to Earth. A double reflection can occur during such times where the light going to Earth would not be directly into the viewers eyes, but hit water and ice in the atmosphere bouncing yet again at a tangental angle into a viewers eyes. This is what was occurring in the Poland snaps, and yes the photographer saw this naked eye as reported.

A third example was captured in Padua, Italy on August 24, 2009, at dusk. The cameraman noticed an elongated Sun, and stopped along the highway to film it. There is no question about a reflection on a window pane, as cars passing on the highway can be seen and heard. Headlights are mandatory in Italy on such highways, even in daylight. Per the Zetas, this is a moon swirl capture, where sunlight funnels down a moon swirls and is focused and intensified. Moon swirls have been captured in the past, as often as the corpus of Planet X itself have been captured. Examples from 2003-2005 are from target="_top">China, target="_top">Italy, and target="_top">New York.

Hello everyone fom Fabrizio creator of the video in Padua! I've said previously for my other videos and I repeat once again: to me to be here mingling with Photoshop or anything like that plus I do not even know what they are and how to use them, losing hours to make fake videos to put on You Tube does not interest me at all! I was coming home from work, intrigued by the Sun which was slightly elongated on the right side and I stopped focusing with the camera on the elongation which turned out to be a second small circle! It is a video made in 2 minutes, downloaded to PC via Blue Tooth and on the internet, there are no fake trees made of cardboard or just pixeled Sun or anything else, maybe on a photo I could do it but not on a video for sure, plus I wanted to put music but I didn't even managed to do that! So, if what I filmed is Nibiru, Planet X, the Sun, Mercury, Venus or Mars I don't know. The fact is that the video is true, not modified or anything like that!!

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97vfBoJLaB8

ZetaTalk Explanation 8/29/2009: This video is not a valid capture of Planet X, the Second Sun. It has no obvious flaws, though the quality is poor so details are hard to make out. The Ecliptic plunges from upper left to lower right in Italy at dusk, putting this theoretical Planet X above the Ecliptic and not to the right of the Sun along the Ecliptic as it currently rides. Even allowing for light rays bending to put a placement at a distance, this is too extreme. Then what is it? What could cause an elongated Sun viewed by naked eye, and dual orbs when captured on camera? When Planet X first arrived in the inner solar system in 2003, many of the photos were of the moon swirls, which form long tubes when seen from the side. These tubes focus light bouncing down the tube such that they appear as light orbs when the tube is turned toward the viewer. This focused light, coming down along a moon swirl tube, can be significant and mistaken for the shrouded Planet X corpus itself.

Collapsing Bridges

Someone noted in an email to me documenting that the pace of collapsing bridges, worldwide, seems to have picked up lately. During the past two months, bridges have collapsed in India, Ireland, Winnipeg, Iowa, Mexico, and China. In India, a bridge that stood for the past 100 years collapsed without explanation. In Ireland, Winnipeg, and Mexico, the collapse is ascribed to excess or erratic tides undermining the foundations of bridge footings. And in Iowa, ascribed to a particularly heavy truck. But aren't tides and heavy trucks a normal occurrence? What is going on here?

Suomen Kuvalehti India Bridge Collapse
August 25, 2009
http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/kuvat/2009/08/25/india-bridge-collapse

A crowd gathers at the site of a century-old bridge that collapsed near Kadirganj Bazar, in Navada district of Bihar state, India, Aug. 25, 2009. A truck, two cars and a cart carrying people plunged nearly 20 feet (6 meters) into the Sakari river, killing two people and injuring 20 others.

 

Erosion caused Irish bridge collapse
August 25, 2009
http://www.nce.co.uk/news/structures/erosion-caused-irish-bridge-collapse/5207153.article

The collapse of a railway viaduct on one of Ireland's busiest lines has been blamed on erosion of the sea bed. Initial tests indicate recent low tides and heavy rains combined to create a near-disaster on the Malahide estuary crossing on the main Dublin to Belfast track.

 

St. Adolphe bridge closed; collapse feared
August 22, 2009
http://www.winnipegsun.com/news/2009/08/22/10564281.html#/news/

The Highway 210 bridge over the Red River by St. Adolphe will remain closed indefinitely as one of its support piers continues to sink into the river bottom, making the bridge unsafe and possibly even susceptible to collapse. Slope instability likely caused by spring flooding appears to be the problem, although even that is not certain at this point. A complete collapse is not out of the question.

 

Overweight vehicle suspected in Mitchell Co. bridge collapse
August 24, 2009
http://www.wcfcourier.com/articles/2009/08/24/news/breaking_news/doc4a931bf6b2450508112350.txt

There are hundreds of rural bridges in North Iowa whose integrity depends on how much weight is put on them. A Mitchell County bridge on Dancer Avenue near Mona collapsed, apparently after a heavy truck rolled over its span.

 

Bridge collapses in Mexico
July 17, 2009
http://www.bridgeweb.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/1763/Bridge_collapses_in_Mexico.html

Five vehicles were plunged into the water killing at least three people when a bridge collapsed on Friday in Mexico.

 

Bridge Collapse in China Kills Three
July 25, 2009
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1202098/

Shocking images of a truck hanging precariously on the edge of a bridge in China show the terrifying moments following the structure's collapse. Three people were killed and 12 others injured after boulders destroyed the Chediguan bridge in Wenchuan County in the country's Sichuan province. This is the second tragedy to hit the region in the past year. An earthquake on 12 May 2008 left almost 90,000 people dead or missing.

The Zetas have long predicted collapsing bridges, along with other Earth changes such as train derailment, buckling roadways, and sinkholes. This will greatly increase in the last weeks, making travel difficult if not impossible.

ZetaTalk Prediction 4/5/2003: Stretching results in quakes, as the plates underneath, in layers like flaky pie crust, release. Stretching results in land not supporting prior buildings or roads or bridges, which suddenly collapse.

ZetaTalk Prediction 5/20/2006: But the worry that travel won't be possible won't really happen until we have increased stress on the crust and that would be the week of rotation stoppage in which the core is attempting to turn and the crust is resisting but they are attempting to stay together as one unit. The thick magma causing the core to be glued to the crust, or visa versa, and therefore the stress is greatly acerbated. It is during that week that you will have imploding cities, bursting gas mains and buckling roadways, so that travel will become impossible.

The individual who noted an increase in collapsing bridges also points out that imploding buildings and derailing trains have also increased during the past two months, confirming the Zeta predictions that such Earth changes are related and will all be on the increase at the same time.

Earth Frenzy Radio

Once again, Steve Shaman of Earth Frenzy Radio has had the ZetaTalk emissary on for an extended 2 hour interview. Listen to the archive stream or download for your iPod. Steve is the webmaster of the Skywatch website.

You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.