Re: Planet X: MOVED to Oct 4 Coordinates
Earl Colby Pottinger wrote in message <email@example.com>
> firstname.lastname@example.org (I M Openmind) :
>> Steve and Dell and others continue to play with single frame pixel
>> defects as I show
>> and Nancy proves again that she is always wrong by confirming that a 4
>> pixel defect on Steve's frame 4 is her "planet"
> Now Nancy faces a big problem. Finding 1 pixel noise, easy! Finding 2-3
> pixel noise, takes a little looking. Finding 4 pixel noise or defect,
> harder still. But the more pixels needed, harder to find random matches. 6
> pixels is going to be very hard and eight pixels (unless it is a very cheap
> CCD) near impossible!
> Earl Colby Pottinger
Nancy doesn't face any problem, you guys are the ones facing the problem! What are
the odds of this 4 pixel "noise" along with a companion white light 2 pixel "noise"
showing up in two images in a row, at the exact location of the Zeta coordinates and
additionally moving exactly as the Zeta coordinates predict from Sept 21 to Oct 4 and
being the correct predicted size in addition? Hmmm... what are the odds??? The odds are
only going to get better for PX and exponentially worse for you!
> I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, RAMDISK, Cabin
> Raising, Camping, BoatBuilding. What happened to the time?